the Editor of The Virtual Times
Obviously, the laws of physics and thermodynamics require such an overunity machine to be an open system that extracts and utilizes excess energy from an external source. In the case outlined, we extract the excess energy directly from the vacuum in the form of S-flow; essentially we convert our primary source to a Poynting generator rather than a "power" (energy flow loss rate) generator. The resulting overunity machine accomplishes both room temperature superconductivity and also overunity coefficient of performance (Figure 16). It does not violate the conservation laws of physics. It does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is an open system receiving and utilizing excess energy from the vacuum, and the second law need not apply to such systems. [note 18]You see, all power systems are already free energy density flow sourcing systems, if we but use them correctly. Every dipole is a "gating device" for extracting excess field energy density flow from the violent bidirectional flux exchange between the vacuum and each end of the dipole. [note 19] [note 20] When we attach "conducting leads" to a dipolar source, as in the simple two-wire circuit, all we are doing with the conductors is providing waveguides for the extracted S-flows from the vacuum to flow along (it flows outside the conductors) without loss. In effect, each lead is simply extending the pole (i.e., the terminal) to which it is connected.
My associates and I are also working on several other inventions at present, including two more patent applications to be filed in the near future. One of those is in the field of overunity power systems, while the other is in an entirely different, highly proprietary nuclear effort. I will address all these areas in future columns, and those columns will have real "meat" in them.
Present "big science" proclaims that overunity electrical machines are impossible. The reader should understand that the U.S. Patent and Trademarks Office is never going to grant a patent for an overunity electrical machine unless the machine is independently tested and replicated, and unless it is certified by scientists of impeccable credentials. This is as it should be. Legitimate free energy researchers accept that dictum. Eventually the stuff has to work on the bench in order to be validated. On the other hand, free energy researchers also point out that one must not demand of us the next 100 years of national research by a hundred major laboratories immediately! This is still a shoestring operation, because all conventional sources of research funds are denied to the serious overunity researcher (with the single exception of occasional personal funding of a researcher by a private individual). In other words, we demand at least the same kind of consideration that the orthodox nuclear fusion community has enjoyed. Billions of dollars have been poured into that sinkhole, and not a single controlled fusion power unit is working anywhere in the world after decades of work at enormous expense to the taxpayers.
So we overunity researchers deserve at least a decade or two of our own, to try to accomplish overunity electrical system development. We also painfully point out that "Big Science" will not fund a single overunity researcher, for specific overunity purpose, no matter what his credentials or capability. In fact, "Big Science" is part of the problem, because it fervently seeks to prevent any legitimate research in overunity. To carry out its suppression campaign. it resorts to vilification, character assassination, libel, and slander of the overunity researchers themselves __ again, regardless of their qualifications or legitimate scientific procedures. [note 13]
|
|
Comments may be sent to the Editor of The Virtual Times |